FEDERAL THREAT TO FAMILY CAREGIVERS

They Want to Ban Family Caregivers From Being Paid to Care

The Paragon Institute — a conservative think tank with direct ties to the Trump administration — has recommended eliminating Medicaid payments to family caregivers nationwide. For California’s 900,000 IHSS recipients, the consequences would be catastrophic.

900K

CA IHSS
RECIPIENTS

73%

HAVE A FAMILY
CAREGIVER

$911B

MEDICAID CUTS SIGNED
INTO LAW

4.3M

AMERICANS
THREATENED
THESE ARE JUST CALIFORNIA NUMBERS

WITH ANTICIPATED RAPID INCREASES IN HOME CAREGIVER NEEDS, WE NEED MORE FAMILY CAREGIVERS, NOT MORE INSTITUTIONS

This Is Not a Rumor. This Has Already Started.

The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” — signed by President Trump in July 2025 — cuts federal Medicaid spending by $911 billion over ten years. Cuts begin taking effect October 2026. The Paragon Institute is actively pushing to ban family caregiver payments entirely as a next step.

What They’re Trying to Do

The Paragon Institute published a report in early 2026 recommending that the federal government prohibit Medicaid from paying relatives or household members for home care. They frame it as “fraud prevention” — but the real targets are the millions of American families who depend on programs like California’s IHSS to keep their loved ones home, safe, and cared for by the people who know them best.

What They Think They’re Accomplishing

The Paragon Institute’s argument is built on the claim that family caregiving is uniquely prone to fraud — that when money flows between relatives, oversight breaks down. What they don’t say is that their preferred alternative is institutional care. Their own report states it plainly: institutional care is “subject to more centralized regulation” and “oversight is easier.” This is not a fraud prevention policy. It is a cost-shifting policy dressed up as accountability — one that trades your loved one’s bed at home for a bed in a facility, because a facility is easier for the government to manage.

Why They’re Wrong

The fraud argument collapses under its own logic. If family caregivers are the problem, the solution would be better oversight — not elimination. Instead, Paragon recommends removing an entire category of care that serves millions of people, based on fraud rates they cannot actually quantify. Their own report admits that more than two-thirds of states cannot provide data on what percentage of waiver participants receive family care. You cannot build a national ban on data that doesn’t exist. The economics don’t work either. Institutional care costs Medicaid significantly more than home-based care. Nursing facility placement runs two to three times the cost of keeping someone at home with a family caregiver. Eliminating family caregiver payments does not save money — it shifts costs to the most expensive setting available, while destroying the care arrangement that the person and their family actually chose. And the workforce isn’t there. Nearly one in three home care workers is an immigrant, and immigration enforcement has already created dangerous shortages. Ban family caregivers, lose a third of the paid workforce to policy — and there is simply no one left to provide the care. The people who need it don’t disappear. They end up in emergency rooms, in nursing facilities, or alone. Take away their caregivers, and there is nowhere to put these people. The United States does not have the nursing facility capacity to absorb the millions of people currently cared for at home by family members. Nursing homes are already understaffed, already at or near capacity in most states, and already struggling with a workforce crisis of their own. A policy that eliminates family caregiver payments doesn’t move people into institutions — it moves them onto waiting lists, into emergency rooms, and into crisis. For people with complex medical needs, severe disabilities, or dementia, that gap in care is not an inconvenience. It is a medical emergency. The infrastructure to replace family caregiving does not exist, was never built, and cannot be built in the months between a policy change and the moment a family loses their caregiver.

Read the Evidence

Paragon Institute: The Report Itself

The smoking gun — the actual recommendation: “States and CMS should investigate, curb, and consider prohibiting Medicaid payments to family members for caregiving services.” Why they want it — they literally say institutions are easier to manage: “Unlike institutional care, which is subject to more centralized regulation and where oversight is easier, HCBS often relies on decentralized networks of caregivers.” Their logic applied to your family: “When the caregiver is a family member who uses the funding as an income stream, there is a greater incentive for both the recipient and the family member to inflate hours or service intensity for greater reimbursement.” They are saying that by definition, you are probably committing fraud. The Dr. Oz connection — he’s running CMS: “CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz has placed renewed and overdue emphasis on combating fraud, waste, and abuse in Medicaid, particularly abuses tied to… long-running schemes in states such as Minnesota and California.” California. That’s you. Read the full report — in their own words.

TIME: Cuts Could Force Children to Become Caregivers

When paid family caregivers lose their income, the work doesn’t disappear. It falls to whoever is left at home. For millions of families, that person is a child.
Lisa McCarty knows this firsthand. At 13, after her mother suffered a traumatic brain injury, she became her mother’s caregiver. “I was the parent,” she writes. “She was the child.

She is not alone. According to the National Alliance for Caregiving and AARP, there are over 5.4 million children in the U.S. — especially girls — currently caring for chronically ill and disabled family members. Research shows this population has higher rates of depression, anxiety, substance use disorders, and suicide than their peers.

Neo, 16, has been caring for his father since he suffered a stroke four years ago. “Sometimes I get anxious and worry about what the future is going to be like,” he says. “I find myself losing focus and losing sleep because I’m worried about what’s going to happen to him. It’s hard to take care of someone as a child.”

An estimated 11.8 million Americans who require Medicaid are expected to lose critical coverage — including up to 4.3 million who rely on home and community based services. McCarty is direct about what that means: “The Republican proposal to further slash Medicaid would only create more adults like me, faced with childhood caregiving trauma that takes time, sometimes decades, to overcome.”

Professor Saul Becker, who has studied young carers for thirty years, puts it simply: “The U.S. needs to have an ideological and cultural belief that children are important.”

“The Trump Administration claims to prioritize children, but they need to act now to protect even the most unseen kids — the caregiving youth in the U.S. — before their mental health problems grow beyond repair.” — Lisa McCarty, TIME

 

Read the full story in TIME.

Health Journalism: What's at Stake If HCBS Is Cut

For millions of older Americans, Medicaid home and community based services are not a luxury. They are the only realistic way to get help with bathing, eating, dressing, and managing medications at home. Cut them, and there is nowhere else to turn.

KFF estimates that 5.1 million Medicaid enrollees used home care in 2023. Medicaid now pays about two-thirds of all U.S. spending on home and community based services — filling a gap that Medicare does not cover. The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” is projected to reduce that funding by $911 billion over the next decade.

“Unlike the federal government, states are required to balance their budgets,” said Alice Burns, Associate Director of KFF’s Program on Medicaid and the Uninsured. “We don’t yet know how these cuts will play out.”

The workforce crisis makes it worse. Nearly one in three home care workers are immigrants. Since the immigration crackdown began, about 13% of paid home care workers report not going to work. Burns is direct: “It’s inconceivable that this won’t place a further strain on home care.”

And it isn’t just the people receiving care who are at risk. More than 8 million family caregivers — about 13% of the 63 million U.S. family caregivers — rely on Medicaid for their own health insurance.

When asked what percentage of waiver participants receive paid care from relatives, more than two-thirds of states could not provide data. They want to eliminate a program they cannot even measure.

Read the full report at Health Journalism.

Justice in Aging: IHSS Under Threat in 2026

H.R. 1 makes the largest cuts to Medicaid in the program’s 60-year history — nearly four times as large as any previous Medicaid cut. The bill cuts over a trillion dollars from Medicaid, Medicare, and the Affordable Care Act while also removing protections for nursing home residents. These massive cuts significantly harm access to health and long-term care for low-income older adults, people with disabilities, their caregivers and families in California.

Home and community based services are particularly at risk. During tough budget years, HCBS accounts for over half of all optional Medicaid spending. “We know from history that HCBS is cut when Medicaid funding is cut.” — Hagar Dickman, Director of CA Long-Term Services & Supports Advocacy, Justice in Aging

The catch-22 is deliberate and devastating. To qualify for a work requirement exemption, you need medical documentation proving your disability. To get that documentation, you need health coverage to see a doctor. “If you don’t have Medi-Cal because you aren’t working and can’t prove your disability, you are being put in a terrible position.”

In California alone, an estimated 3.4 million people will lose Medi-Cal coverage. The state will be forced to choose who to cut — and optional services like IHSS are always first on the list.

“We really need to be making noise and encouraging policymakers at every level to do everything they can to stop HCBS from being scaled back.” — Hagar Dickman, Justice in Aging

 

 

Read the full analysis from Justice in Aging.

National Association of Counties: HCBS Cuts Threaten Home Care

More than 4 million people rely on Medicaid-funded home and community based services — including those with intellectual and developmental disabilities, older adults, and people with complex medical needs. Two-thirds of all HCBS funding comes from Medicaid. Cut Medicaid, and you cut the people who depend on it most.

The workforce is already in crisis. The HCBS workforce is expected to grow more than any single occupation in the coming decade — but turnover is already upwards of 80%. Roughly 40% of home care workers live in low-income households, and about one-third rely on Medicaid for their own health coverage.

“If we take more money out of the system, we’re likely to experience some degree of cuts to care and also to jobs that will worsen the recruitment and retention challenges that we’re already facing.” — Stephen McCall, Director of Research, PHI

“If you have physical, intellectual developmental disabilities, or if a family member does, where do you want to be? You want to be in your home. You want the freedom, you want the independence, you want to be in and around your community — and quite frankly, that’s good, because that’s a much cheaper place to be.” — Matt Salo, CEO, Salo Health Strategies

A staff member of a former chairman of the Senate Finance Committee — the committee with direct jurisdiction over Medicaid — once asked: “Is Medicaid the one for old people, or the other one?”

“When something is hard to understand, it’s hard to appreciate. It becomes easy to dismiss. It becomes easy to ‘other’-ize, and therefore easy to make significant, devastating changes to it without really understanding.” — Matt Salo

 

Read the full report from the National Association of Counties.

KFF: Medicaid Home Care — What's at Stake

Medicaid paid for two-thirds of all home care spending in the United States in 2023. It is the primary source of coverage for the 5.1 million Americans who rely on home and community based services to eat, bathe, manage medications, and stay in their own homes. Medicare generally does not cover this care. There is no backup plan.

All 50 responding states currently pay family caregivers under some circumstances. All allow caregivers to be selected, trained, and dismissed by the people they serve. These are not fraudulent arrangements — they are the deliberate, structured foundation of home care in America.

KFF focus groups found that family caregivers often reported struggling to make ends meet and having to reduce their work hours due to caregiving demands. Medicaid payments are not a bonus. For millions of families, they are the difference between staying afloat and financial collapse.

Nearly one in three home care workers are immigrants. The Trump Administration’s intensified immigration enforcement is already shrinking an already strained workforce. “For family caregivers, many may need to continue to provide care without payments.” Six words. No drama needed.

Over 8 million family caregivers — 13% of the 63 million U.S. family caregivers — rely on Medicaid for their own health insurance. When asked what percentage of waiver participants receive paid care from relatives, more than two-thirds of states could not provide data. They want to eliminate a program they cannot even measure.

 

Read the full KFF analysis.

Stop the Federal Family Caregiver Ban

Tell your elected officials to defend IHSS and oppose federal efforts to eliminate paid family caregiving under Medicaid.

Instructions

Choose your letter type, select your state, then choose a recipient. Enter your name and edit the letter to add your story — personal messages carry more weight. Click Open in Email App to send directly, or Copy to Clipboard to paste into any email or web contact form.

Other Ways to Fight Back

for caregivers

DONT FIGHT THIS ALONE!

UDW UNION
The UDW UNION Member Resource Center is your connection to rallies, testimony opportunities, and organized letter campaigns. Please Call!
1-800-621-5016

VOTE

JUNE PRIMARY IS COMING

Low turnout primaries decide who governs California — and right now, that matters more than ever. The Governor’s race and legislature seats are on the line, and the people who show up in June choose who fights for IHSS in Sacramento.

Not sure what’s actually at stake? Read this first.
Make sure you’re registered to vote!

DONT FIGHT THIS ALONE!

SEIU 2015 UNION
The SEIU 2015 UNION Member Resource Center is your connection to rallies, testimony opportunities, and organized letter campaigns.
Please Call!
1-855-810-2015

More Ways to Fight Back

for everybody

SUPPORT OUR FAMILIES!

JUSTICE IN AGING

Under federal law, states have the option to provide these services, but they are not required to do so. As a result, during budget shortfalls—whether caused by federal Medicaid funding cuts, a recession, or other financial challenges—states frequently consider reducing optional benefits like HCBS to balance their budgets.

These folks are actively litigating and lobbying against IHSS cuts.

justiceinaging.org

VOTE

JUNE PRIMARY IS COMING

Low turnout primaries decide who governs California — and right now, that matters more than ever. The Governor’s race and legislature seats are on the line, and the people who show up in June choose who fights for IHSS in Sacramento.

Make sure you’re registered to vote!

TELL YOUR STORY

YOUR VOICE MATTERS

You are not a statistic. You are the reason this fight exists.

Write a letter to your local newspaper
Contact your legislator directly and tell them what IHSS means to your daily life
Submit public testimony — your voice belongs in that room

Share on social media — tag your representatives

 

You don’t need perfect words.
You need your truth.

SHOW UP

YOUR PRESENCE IS POWER

Elected officials hold town halls. Show up. Bring your story. Bring a friend. A room full of caregivers and care recipients is impossible to ignore. That means public comment periods are opening right now. Your comment becomes part of the official federal record — and they are required to read it.

 

Take action:

  • Find your rep’s town hall schedule at their official website
  • Submit a public comment at regulations.gov
  • Bring someone with you — numbers matter

YOUR COMMENT – ON RECORD

THEY HAVE TO READ IT – FEDERAL LAW

When the federal government proposes policy changes, they are legally required to open a public comment period — and legally required to consider what they receive.
CMS must release implementation guidance for the Medicaid cuts by June 2026. That window is opening now.

Your comment does not need to be long. It does not need legal language. It needs to be real. A paragraph about what IHSS means to your family carries weight in that record.
How to submit:

Go to regulations.gov
Search “Medicaid HCBS” or “home and community based services”
Click the active comment period and submit.

 

One paragraph. Your name. Your truth. On the federal record forever.

SHARE THIS

EVERY SHARE ADDS VISIBILITY

The people making decisions about your care are counting on you not knowing what’s happening. Prove them wrong.
Share this page. Share your story. Share your anger. Share what IHSS means to your family — in your own words, on your own feed, to your own people.
Tag your representatives directly:

 

Find your CA reps on Twitter/X, Facebook, and Instagram
  • Use hashtags: #SaveIHSS #DefendHomecare #FamilyCaregivers
  • Link back to this page so others can take action too
  • You don’t need a platform. You need to hit share.

This page was created by an IHSS caregiver in Santa Barbara County, California. Not affiliated with any political party.
All sources are linked and publicly available.

Share This
Skip to content